Case Answers:
Answer 1
Answer 2
Answer 3
Answer 4
Answer 5
Answer 6
Answer 7
The gradient on room air is the best use of the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient.
PAO2 = FiO2(PATM – PH20)– (PaCO2/0.8)
PATM = 760mmHg
PH20 = 47mmHg
PAO2 = .21 (760-47) – (30/0.8) = 150-37.5 = 112.5
PAO2 – PaO2 = 112.5 – 80 = 32.5
Normal predicted alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient is: 4 + (Age/4)
Age 20 yr = 4 + (20/4) = 9
Age 80 yr = 4 + (80/4) = 24
Answer 8
Answer 9
You need to calculate your pre-test probability with the modified Well’s criteria
Clinical symptoms of DVT (leg swelling, pain with palpation) |
3.0 |
Other diagnosis less likely than pulmonary embolism |
3.0 |
Heart rate >100 |
1.5 |
Immobilization (>3 days) or surgery in the previous four weeks |
1.5 |
Previous DVT/PE |
1.5 |
Hemoptysis |
1.0 |
Malignancy |
1.0 |
Dichotomized score: 0-1: Low
PE likely >4
2-6: Intermediate
PE unlikely </= 4
>7: High
Our patient’s score is 8.5
Answer 10
Based on her pre-test probability of 8.5, the next test should be a CTPA.
a)
Chest xray should be ordered if the PERC tool is zero (d-dimer not even
indicated) and you want to workup the patient’s symptoms of dyspnea.
The PERC (PE rule-out criteria) tool was designed to help guide
clinicians in identifying low-risk patients (patients in whom the
physician has a genuine concern about PE and whose initial risk
stratification identifies them as being low risk).
Should decrease the use of d-dimer testing.
|
YES |
NO |
Age< 50 |
0 |
1 |
Initial HR <100 bpm |
0 |
1 |
Initial O2 sat >94% on RA |
0 |
1 |
No unilateral leg swelling |
0 |
1 |
No hemoptysis |
0 |
1 |
No surgery or trauma within 4 weeks |
0 |
1 |
No hx of VTE |
0 |
1 |
No estrogen use |
0 |
1 |
Pretest probability with score of 0 is <1%
b)
D-dimer would be checked if the pre-test probability is intermediate or if
the pretest prob is low but the PERC is +.
Remember to age adjust the d-dimer (500 + ((age-50) * 10) is cutoff
for normal) if the patient is older than 50.
c)
CT-PE protocol would be appropriate for our patient (high risk) or
intermediate risk with a + d-dimer
i.CTA
is very specific for PE (80-97%) but sensitivity can vary (53-100%).
ii.The
primary limitation of CTA is that it can miss distal emboli (but clinical
significance of peripheral clots is unknown).
iii.Therefore,
if CTA is negative or non-diagnostic for PE, think of your pre-test
probability.
iv.If
PTP is high, get an additional study to rule out VTE such as LE Doppler or
a VQ scan
d)
LE Doppler would be appropriate if the patient is having signs or sx of a
DVT. If this is positive, you will treat with anticoagulation and avoid
any additional imaging.
e)
VQ scan is appropriate for a high risk or intermediate risk with a +
d-dimer who has a contraindication to CT (history of reactions to contrast
agents, pregnancy, radioactive iodine treatment for thyroid disease,
metformin use, and chronic or acutely worsening renal disease)
f)
If pt is too hemodynamically unstable for CTA or if CTA is not available,
start anticoagulation and get TTE to look for RV dysfunction or TEE to
look for emboli in the main pulmonary arteries.
Answer 11
a.
High probability
scan: >2 large segmental defects without corresponding ventilation or CXR
abnormalities or any perfusion defect substantially larger than radiographic
abnormality
b.
Intermediate (indeterminate) probability:
borderline high or borderline low, not falling into normal, low or high prob
c.
Low probability:
i.
any perfusion defect with substantially larger radiographic abnormality
ii.
matched ventilation and perfusion defects with normal chest radiograph
iii.
small subsegmental perfusion defects
d.
Normal scan:
normal perfusion, normal ventilation (very good sens and spec)
Again, think about pre-test probability!
a.
If PTP is high and you have a high probability VQ scan, specificity is very good
(88-96%)
b.
If PTP is low and you have a low or normal VQ scan, sensitivity is very good
(94-100%)
c.
BUT, if PTP is low and you have a high prob scan, sensitivity drops to 55%
Answer 12
Answer 13
Answer 14
Age >80
Hx of cancer
Hx of chronic cardiopulmonary disease
HR>110
SBP<100
O2 sat <90%
If her
score was zero, her risk of death is low and she can be discharged home.
Answer 15
i.
For VTE associated with cancer, LMWH is recommended over VKA or any direct oral
anticoagulants
ii.
NOACs contraindicated if INR raised because of liver disease; VKA difficult to
control and INR may not reflect antithrombotic effect.
i.
NOACs and LMWH contraindicated with severe renal impairment.
Based on less bleeding with NOACs and greater convenience for patients and
health-care providers, we now suggest that a NOAC (dabigatran, rivaroxaban,
apixaban, or edoxaban) is used in preference to VKA for the initial and
long-term treatment of VTE in patients without cancer.
Factor |
Preferred Anticoagulant |
|
Cancer |
LMWH |
|
Once daily oral therapy preferred |
Rivaroxaban; edoxaban; VKA |
|
Liver disease and coagulopathy |
LMWH |
NOACs contraindicated if INR raised because of liver disease; VKA
difficult to control and INR may not reflect antithrombotic effect. |
Renal disease and creatinine clearance <30 mL/min |
VKA |
NOACs and LMWH contraindicated with severe renal impairment. Dosing of
NOACs with levels of renal impairment differ with the NOAC and among
jurisdictions. |
Coronary artery disease |
VKA, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban |
Coronary artery events appear to occur more often with dabigatran than
with VKA. |
Dyspepsia or history of GI bleeding |
VKA, apixaban |
Dabigatran increased dyspepsia. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban
may be associated with more GI bleeding than VKA. |
Poor compliance |
VKA |
INR monitoring can help to detect problems. However, some patients may
be more compliant with a NOAC because it is less complex. |
Thrombolytic therapy use |
UFH infusion |
|
Reversal agent needed |
VKA, UFH |
|
Pregnancy or pregnancy risk |
LMWH |
|
a.
For VTE associated with cancer, LMWH is recommended over VKA (Grade 2B) or any
direct oral anticoagulants (all Grade 2C).
b.
Start warfarin on day of starting anticoagulation and overlap at least 5 days
(even if INR >2 earlier than that)
Answer 16
She has a VTE provoked by a nonsurgical reversible risk factor (estrogen +
smoking) and should
be treated for 3 months
|
Risk of recurrence after 1 year |
Risk of recurrence after 5 years |
Recommended duration of anticoagulation |
VTE provoked by surgery: |
1% |
3% |
3-6 months |
VTE provoked by nonsurgical reversible factor (estrogen, pregnancy, leg
injury, flight >8hrs): |
5% |
15% |
3-6 months |
Unprovoked VTE |
10% |
30% |
If low/mod bleeding risk, indefinite **
If high bleeding risk: 3 months |
Provoked VTE with persistent risk factor (antiphospholipid syndrome or
other inherited thrombophilias) |
|
Indefinite |
|
VTE in setting of cancer |
15% annual risk |
Lifelong
|
|
Unprovoked isolated distal DVT |
|
Serial U/S or
3 months of a/c if risk factors for extension of clot |
** In the unprovoked VTE group with low risk of bleeding, patient sex and Ddimer
level measured about 1 month after stopping a/c therapy can help further
stratify the risk of recurrent VTE.
For isolated distal DVT, you can either start A/C or do serial u/s.
RF for extension of distal DVT and would therefore favor starting a/c
include:
Answer 17
|
C |
|
A |
|
B |
|
C |
|
A |
·
In most patients with
acute PE NOT associated with hypotension, thrombolytics are NOT recommended
o
PE + no shock = 2%
mortality
·
In patients with
acute PE and hypotension (Massive PE) but have a higher risk of bleeding with
systemic thrombolytic therapy, catheter-directed therapy is recommended over no
such intervention.
·
Submassive PE is defined as PE plus RV dysfunction on echo +/- increase in cardiac
biomarkers (troponin or BNP) but NO hypotension.
o
ACCP does not
recommend thrombolytic therapy routinely for patients with submassive PE
·
Deterioration that
has not resulted in hypotension (progressive increase in heart rate, a decrease
in systolic BP (which remains >90 mm Hg), an increase in jugular venous
pressure, worsening gas exchange, signs of shock (eg, cold sweaty skin, reduced
urine output, confusion), progressive right heart dysfunction on
echocardiography, or an increase in cardiac biomarkers) may also prompt the use
of thrombolytic therapy.
Answer 18
a.
As mentioned in above table, her risk of
recurrent VTE is 5% within 1 year and 15% within 5 years.
It is important to consider reducing all possible risks factors which
includes smoking cessation.
Answer 19
a.
IVC filter.
Indications for IVC filter include:
i.
Major contraindication to anticoagulation
therapy
ii.
Recurrent VTE despite therapeutic
anticoagulation
iii.
Chronic recurrent VTE with pulmonary HTN
b.
Note that insertion of IVC filter does not
eliminate the risk of PE and increases
risk for DVT. Therefore, IVC filter
should be “removable” and anticoagulation should be initiated once bleeding risk
resolves.